Is there a difference between Child Porn and Child Art? - Page 2

ec_nana · July 28th, 2009, 03:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Equal Hater

I think they're called artistic pedophiles.

livindeadgirl · July 28th, 2009, 10:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ec_nana

gorygirl666 · July 29th, 2009, 12:39 AM

What i believe is the main difference is like what has been mentioned before based on actual statues and sculptures from ancient times with a meaning of parenthood and the love of a mother for her child. Also there is the pictures of naked babies that do not show genitals, but are meant just to talk about children. Like in those Parenting magazines....

Plus when babies are first born they just have a blanket wrapped around them, and are usually shown naked if they are hooked up to machines or have some sort of birth defect....so there are alot of types of images of children, NOT in a sexual way, but in a parenting way, or in a medical way...its all in the eyes of the viewer however, which is what usually determines art over pedophilia...

Seroquel · July 29th, 2009, 01:54 AM

Uhg, move to britain.

Gogo · July 29th, 2009, 02:03 AM

Dude seems to be having a field day garnering comments and reactions.
Questions about pedophilic images, torturing rats, etc.
Wonder what next quandary he'll put forth.

GorehoundLarry · July 29th, 2009, 02:46 AM

ec_nana · July 29th, 2009, 03:13 AM

He wished to gather more comments so that he can watch whatever vids or pics, which some purportedly claim are supposedly artistic and not pedophilic, in blissful ignorant peace.

tormentor666 · August 9th, 2009, 08:16 PM

The thing that the authorities neglected to mention was when they took all jackos "boy books" they were most proberbly in amongst his porno stash and heavily cum covered in jesus juice.

if your "boy love books" are in your porno stash...your a pedo... simple.
as for why some "art lover" wants pics of young naked kids on his wall..there is only one answer... its WANK MATERIAL.

art.... lame excuse.

M.O.DENGLER · August 9th, 2009, 08:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by themiker

Whats the big differences between art and porn.. Nude kid is a nude kid..

You're an adult..if you honestly can't answer that question yerself.. you're as well swallowing a bullet..(just in case)

janine · August 25th, 2009, 08:04 AM

Great comment Gogo you rock my friend:cth ulhu:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gogo

Dude seems to be having a field day garnering comments and reactions.
Questions about pedophilic images, torturing rats, etc.
Wonder what next quandary he'll put forth.

Thanatos · August 25th, 2009, 08:06 AM

kristan much? nice emotes, btw.

Jane · September 19th, 2009, 01:46 PM

I kinda like themiker for trolling so good

The internet pervert · September 29th, 2009, 05:02 AM

There is no difference between child porn and child art. Stupid question.

LauraDanzig · September 29th, 2009, 07:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by themiker

I'm not saying I sleep with 16 year old girls but you gotta admit some of them look a little older, have nice firm tits and great tan legs etc etc.

I personaly think its quite different looking than actualy going after them. I don't go below what ever the legal age is which in the US its 18.

I don't hump anything younger than that although I look at 16 and 17 year old girls and personaly see nothing wrong about it, as far as artistic pictures I don't see anything wrong with that.

As long as its art. Anything younger than 16 is not good for any reason, art or otherwise.

youre disgusting..you know that?

i hope you meet chris hanson soon, or an angry redneck father with a shotgun and a fat snarly dog.

Carnage · October 11th, 2009, 06:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by M.O.DENGLER

You're an adult..if you honestly can't answer that question yerself.. you're as well swallowing a bullet..(just in case)

Amen brother!

July 29th, 2009, 01:54 AM	#19 (permalink)
Seroquel reared it's ugly head and Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: sprawling... Posts: 1,344	Uhg, move to britain. __________________ Fuck a signature.

July 29th, 2009, 03:13 AM	#22 (permalink)
ec_nana U . R . V Join Date: Sep 2008 Posts: 3,559	He wished to gather more comments so that he can watch whatever vids or pics, which some purportedly claim are supposedly artistic and not pedophilic, in blissful ignorant peace. __________________ Rage becomes truly horrifying when everyone has forgotten how the poison got into their system and no one knows, or cares, how to get it out. We, humans, are nothing but flies to the Gods who played us for their sport.

August 25th, 2009, 08:06 AM	#26 (permalink)
Thanatos on de la tour Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 4,069	kristan much? nice emotes, btw. __________________ lol

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

July 29th, 2009, 02:03 AM	#20 (permalink)
Gogo Psycho Moderator Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: detox Posts: 1,334	Dude seems to be having a field day garnering comments and reactions. Questions about pedophilic images, torturing rats, etc. Wonder what next quandary he'll put forth.

July 29th, 2009, 02:46 AM	#21 (permalink)
GorehoundLarry Let's do it Join Date: Nov 2007 Posts: 1,811

August 9th, 2009, 08:16 PM	#23 (permalink)
tormentor666 Freakin' Noob Join Date: Dec 2008 Posts: 47	The thing that the authorities neglected to mention was when they took all jackos "boy books" they were most proberbly in amongst his porno stash and heavily cum covered in jesus juice. if your "boy love books" are in your porno stash...your a pedo... simple. as for why some "art lover" wants pics of young naked kids on his wall..there is only one answer... its WANK MATERIAL. art.... lame excuse.

September 29th, 2009, 05:02 AM	#28 (permalink)
The internet pervert Freakin' Noob Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Hell Posts: 27	There is no difference between child porn and child art. Stupid question.