20 "people" killed in 20 seconds

Rassenkrieg · February 15th, 2009, 04:57 PM

Yeah, fucking muslims, this is fucking effective though, for a genocide that would.

colt · February 15th, 2009, 05:00 PM

Welcome to the middle east....

ICBMIRV · February 15th, 2009, 05:24 PM

Quote:

this is fucking effective though

Not really.

GoatFacedPig · February 15th, 2009, 05:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ICBMIRV

Not really.

20 people killed in 20 seconds
not affective?
how so?

Rassenkrieg · February 15th, 2009, 06:17 PM

Yeah, how so?

One each second = 3600 per hour, 3600x24 = 86 000

I think it's effective.

ICBMIRV · February 15th, 2009, 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoatFacedPig

20 people killed in 20 seconds
not affective?
how so?

It's not useful for any mass action.

Quote:

Yeah, how so?

One each second = 3600 per hour, 3600x24 = 86 000

I think it's effective.

Assuming that you're going to use only one bullet per person, even if you use cheap bullets, you would need at least around 6000 dollars per day, and that's not including the costs and delays connected with repairing and replacing broken guns.

Jeckyl · February 15th, 2009, 07:18 PM

A cliff is all you need. You'll get at least 98% KIA from your 86,000 within seconds at a range of say 100ft?

Cliffs are free and require little or no maintenance. The purchase of addtional hardware such as guns and/or ammunition is not required.

Rassenkrieg · February 15th, 2009, 07:31 PM

Like they pay for their bullets...

gorygirl666 · February 15th, 2009, 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeckyl

A cliff is all you need. You'll get at least 98% KIA from your 86,000 within seconds at a range of say 100ft?

Cliffs are free and require little or no maintenance. The purchase of addtional hardware such as guns and/or ammunition is not required.

However finding a cliff that is high enough off the ground and having only jagged rocks underneath, or anything if the cliff is high enough, is the hard part. The ones that are within this are usually tourist destinations, plus to kill 86,000 people in this fashion would take more then just a high cliff because after the bodies start stacking up it will be a softer landing and those on the very top may not actually die. Again that is depending on the height of the cliff and what is at the bottom of that cliff...

p4irs · February 16th, 2009, 09:20 AM

i say gas chamber

Forty-six · February 16th, 2009, 09:38 AM

Much better than beheading with blunt kitchen knive.

alhaggar · February 16th, 2009, 09:45 AM

How about drowing? Easy and cheap.

Carnivore · February 16th, 2009, 04:39 PM

chemical or biological is much more effective for mass genocide. Just ask Saddam. Oh wait, that motherfucker is dead too, just as it should be.

...N.I.B... · February 16th, 2009, 05:04 PM

Dig a big long hole with a backhoe...toss em in...little of that abundant oil...lighter...

ICBMIRV · February 16th, 2009, 05:23 PM

Biological warfare would be hard to control once germs that you use spread too much. On the other side, chemical warfare requires lots of money and is only useful if you can make sure that you cover at least most of the areas that are to be depopulated. Handling survivors is another cost that you need to add.

Genocide on mass scale isn't as easy as it seems.

[quote]How about drowing? Easy and cheap.[/quote
Drowning requires lots of time when compared to other methods and isn't as fault-proof.

February 15th, 2009, 04:57 PM	#1 (permalink)
Rassenkrieg Banned Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Nowhere to be seen Posts: 6,743	20 "people" killed in 20 seconds Yeah, fucking muslims, this is fucking effective though, for a genocide that would.

February 16th, 2009, 09:20 AM	#10 (permalink)
p4irs Freakin' Noob Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: ho ho ho Posts: 3,121	i say gas chamber __________________ Will you bite the hand that feeds? Will you chew until it bleeds? - Nine Inch Nails

February 16th, 2009, 09:38 AM	#11 (permalink)
Forty-six & 2 Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Old continent Posts: 101	Much better than beheading with blunt kitchen knive. __________________

February 16th, 2009, 05:23 PM	#15 (permalink)
ICBMIRV MDK Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 357	Biological warfare would be hard to control once germs that you use spread too much. On the other side, chemical warfare requires lots of money and is only useful if you can make sure that you cover at least most of the areas that are to be depopulated. Handling survivors is another cost that you need to add. Genocide on mass scale isn't as easy as it seems. [quote]How about drowing? Easy and cheap.[/quote Drowning requires lots of time when compared to other methods and isn't as fault-proof. __________________ It's all fun and games until someone drops a nuke. Last edited by ICBMIRV; February 16th, 2009 at 05:24 PM..

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

February 15th, 2009, 05:00 PM	#2 (permalink)
colt Not A Noob Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 241	Welcome to the middle east....

February 15th, 2009, 06:17 PM	#5 (permalink)
Rassenkrieg Banned Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Nowhere to be seen Posts: 6,743	Yeah, how so? One each second = 3600 per hour, 3600x24 = 86 000 I think it's effective.

February 15th, 2009, 07:18 PM	#7 (permalink)
Jeckyl Fake/Repost Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 396	A cliff is all you need. You'll get at least 98% KIA from your 86,000 within seconds at a range of say 100ft? Cliffs are free and require little or no maintenance. The purchase of addtional hardware such as guns and/or ammunition is not required.

February 15th, 2009, 07:31 PM	#8 (permalink)
Rassenkrieg Banned Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Nowhere to be seen Posts: 6,743	Like they pay for their bullets...

February 16th, 2009, 09:45 AM	#12 (permalink)
alhaggar Freakin' Noob Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Somwhere far away in space and time. Posts: 31	How about drowing? Easy and cheap.

February 16th, 2009, 04:39 PM	#13 (permalink)
Carnivore Not A Noob Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 232	chemical or biological is much more effective for mass genocide. Just ask Saddam. Oh wait, that motherfucker is dead too, just as it should be.

February 16th, 2009, 05:04 PM	#14 (permalink)
...N.I.B... Fuck Off and Die!!! Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 1,017	Dig a big long hole with a backhoe...toss em in...little of that abundant oil...lighter...